Domain Reading Map

MLLM Personalization

A living research map of personalized multimodal intelligence, built from detailed paper notes and their relationships.

23 papers1 subdomain2026: 132025: 72024: 3Generated 2026-07-25
1
2026 arXiv VisualMem Personalized Understanding

Personal Visual Memory from Explicit and Implicit Evidence

VisualMem 让长期记忆系统显式保留图像里的个人实体与隐性用户事实。

Personal Visual Memory from Explicit and Implicit Evidence
中文导读
问题背景
VisualMem 关注长期个性化助手中常被文本记忆忽略的视觉证据:用户的房间、物品、宠物、亲友和反复出现的场景往往不会被文字明确说明,却会决定后续个性化问题的答案。现有 benchmark 即使包含图像,也常能从文本旁路恢复答案;现有 memory 系统则倾向于把图像压缩成通用 caption,丢失身份、所有权和隐性事实。因此论文把 personal visual memory 单独抽出来评测和建模。
核心方法
VisualMem 同时贡献 benchmark 和系统架构。Benchmark 从持久 persona、社交关系、用户资产、事件时间线和全局一致图像生成出发,构造 explicit entity、implicit fact 和 distractor 三类长期多模态事件。系统上,它在 MemOS 文本记忆后端之外加入结构化视觉记忆,图像轮次先结合对话上下文和已有 face/location references 解析身份、地点、用户拥有物、宠物和 durable facts;无法确认的图像进入 pending pool,等待后续证据再解析;问答时并行检索视觉记忆和文本记忆后合并上下文。
评估
VisualMem benchmark 包含 10 个 personas、1,717 个 events、1,718 张 images 和 696 个 questions,覆盖 target person、target asset、visual-only implicit fact 与 multimodal implicit fact。VisualMem overall 达到 84.1,显著高于 MemOS 的 56.0、Mem0 的 45.0 和多种 RAG/文本记忆基线;同时在 LOCOMO 和 PersonaMem 文本 benchmark 上略高于 MemOS。消融表明视觉记忆对人物和资产尤其关键,pending 与 full conversation window 对减少噪声和处理多模态隐性事实有帮助。
借鉴意义
这篇工作的启发在于,个性化长期记忆不能把图像当作普通 caption 的附属材料,而应保留可检索、可解释、可延迟提交的结构化视觉证据。它补齐了 personal assistant 中“图像承载私人事实”的评测与系统缺口,也为 PersonalVCL、PVChat、PEARL、PersonaVLM 这类个性化理解或长期助手方法提供了更强的视觉记忆入口。需要继续解决的是真实数据规模、生成图像 benchmark 外推、记忆冲突/遗忘、pending pool 管理和隐私权限控制。
Abstract

Long-term memory is increasingly important for personalized AI agents, yet existing benchmarks and methods remain largely text-centric. Even when images are included, the user-specific information needed for later questions is typically recoverable from text alone, and most memory systems reduce image turns to generic captions. Yet images often carry personal information that text rarely states -- both explicit evidence, such as recurring user-associated entities, and implicit evidence, such as latent user facts inferred from visual or multimodal cues. We introduce a benchmark for personal visual memory that targets both forms of evidence, and propose VisualMem, a hybrid visual--text architecture that augments a text-memory backend with a structured personal visual memory module. Rather than collapsing images into captions, VisualMem uses conversational context to resolve identity, ownership, and durable user facts. Experiments show that VisualMem substantially outperforms prior memory systems on our benchmark while remaining competitive on standard text-memory benchmarks, indicating that personal visual memory is a distinct and important component of long-term memory for personalized AI agents.

2
2026 arXiv PersonalVCL Personalized Understanding

Personal Visual Context Learning in Large Multimodal Models

PersonalVCL 把用户第一视角视觉历史形式化为 prompt-time 个性化上下文,并用 Personal-VCL-Bench 与 Agentic Context Bank 诊断和改进 LMM 的私有视觉证据利用能力。

Personal Visual Context Learning in Large Multimodal Models
中文导读
问题背景
PersonalVCL 针对可穿戴个人助手中的核心缺口:模型需要利用用户自己的第一视角历史来识别人、物体和行为习惯,而这些事实既不在预训练知识中,也不能靠通用 VQA 解决。论文刻意把问题限定为相关 context 已给定后的利用能力,区分于长视频检索和静态概念注册,并指出直接把更多 raw visual context 拼进 prompt 会暴露视觉证据利用不稳、跨观测聚合不足等问题。
核心方法
论文包含一个 benchmark 和一个推理时 baseline。Personal-VCL-Bench 从 EgoLife、Ego4D Visual Queries、CaptainCook4D 构造 2,255 个 context-query 实例,覆盖人物、物体、行为以及 EgoWearer 身份判断。Agentic Context Bank 不训练新模型,而是在 Stage I 将多个 context clips 抽取为 appearance、owned objects、behavior 三类带证据记忆,并通过 ADD/CONFIRM/REVISE/RETRACT 合并更新;Stage II 先让 LMM 阅读文本化 bank,再按查询选择少量视觉证据组成 hybrid view 进行最终回答。
评估
实验评测 Qwen3-VL、InternVL、Gemma、Gemini 和 GPT 等前沿 LMM,发现 no-context 在身份类任务接近随机,raw visual context 并不稳定优于语言摘要,kmax 也不总是优于 k=1。Agentic Context Bank 在 Gemma-4-31B 的七个任务上全部超过标准 context prompting,例如 EgoWearer ID 从 visual-ctx(kmax) 的 55.36 提升到 61.60;跨 GPT-5.4-mini、Gemma-4-31B、Gemini-3-Flash 的 EgoWearer 消融中,adaptive evidence 也持续优于 descriptors only 和 all evidence。
借鉴意义
这篇工作的重要性在于把 MLLM personalization 从单个私有概念识别推进到个人视觉世界的 context utilization 诊断:真正的助手不仅要记住用户的物体或熟人,还要能从多条历史视觉证据中提炼、更新并按需验证个人事实。它给后续系统提供了清晰的评测轴和一个无需训练的强基线,同时也暴露了证据选择、长期检索、隐私控制和记忆纠错仍是可穿戴个性化 LMM 的关键难题。
Abstract

As wearable devices like smart glasses integrate Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) into the continuous first-person visual streams of individual users, the evolution of these models into true personal assistants hinges on visual personalization: the ability to reason over visual information unique to the wearer. We formalize this capability as Personal Visual Context Learning (Personal VCL), the prompt-time capability of using user-specific visual context to resolve personalized queries. To systematically evaluate this, we present Personal-VCL-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark capturing the personal visual world across persons, objects, and behaviors. Our analysis of frontier LMMs identifies a profound context utilization gap, revealing that the mechanisms for leveraging visual evidence, as well as aggregating multiple visual observations, remain critically understudied. Motivated by these findings, we propose the Agentic Context Bank, a strong inference-time baseline that structures a user's visual context into a self-refining memory bank and employs query-adaptive evidence selection. Our baseline approach consistently improves over standard context prompting regimes across tasks and evaluated backbones, demonstrating a practical path towards future personalized LMMs.

3
2026 CVPR 2026 PersonaVLM Personalized Understanding

PersonaVLM: Long-Term Personalized Multimodal LLMs

PersonaVLM 用多类型长期记忆、迭代检索推理和动态人格对齐,把通用 MLLM 改造成长期个性化助手。

Figure 1
中文导读
问题背景
PersonaVLM 关注长期、多轮、多模态交互中的个性化助手问题:用户偏好、行为习惯和人格特征会随时间显露或变化,单轮输入增强、静态 persona 对齐或直接塞长上下文都难以稳定处理过期偏好、时间线指代和跨会话记忆。论文因此把 personalization 从“认出私有概念并替换名称”推进到“持续维护用户记忆、主动检索相关经历,并按演化中的人格生成回答”。
核心方法
方法核心是把通用 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 组织成带长期状态的 personalized agent。系统维护 Big Five 人格画像,以及 Core、Semantic、Episodic、Procedural 四类记忆;回答阶段先结合当前查询、短期上下文、核心记忆和人格画像推理,必要时生成时间范围和关键词去检索多类记忆,再迭代整合证据生成回答;更新阶段异步抽取新记忆,并用 EMA 式 Personality Evolving Mechanism 更新人格向量。训练上先用 78k 合成样本做 SFT 学会记忆管理和检索推理格式,再用约 5.6k GRPO 样本强化多轮检索、答案准确性、推理一致性和格式遵守。
评估
论文构建 Persona-MME,覆盖 2,034 个 in-situ 案例、七个个性化方面和 14 个细粒度任务,并结合 PERSONAMEM 与 P-SOUPS 评估长期记忆和响应对齐。结果显示 PersonaVLM 在 128k Persona-MME 上比 Qwen2.5-VL-7B RAG baseline 高 12.04,在 PERSONAMEM 上高 9.4;alignment 评测中 Persona-MME 32k/128k 分别达到 89.16/92.22。消融表明 Episodic Memory 是最关键记忆类型,去掉后 32k 总分下降 12.41;PEM 对风格对齐尤其重要。
借鉴意义
这篇工作把 MLLM personalization 明确推到长期 agent 形态:不仅有记忆库,还要有记忆类型分工、主动检索推理、人格演化和系统化评测。对后续研究的借鉴点在于,长期个性化不能只靠更长上下文或单次 RAG,而需要把事件记忆、稳定偏好、行为模式和人格风格分开维护,并在回答前做 query-aware 的证据选择。Persona-MME 也提供了一个比概念识别更接近真实助手能力的评测框架。
Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) serve as daily assistants for millions. However, their ability to generate responses aligned with individual preferences remains limited. Prior approaches enable only static, single-turn personalization through input augmentation or output alignment, and thus fail to capture users' evolving preferences and personality over time (see Fig.1). In this paper, we introduce PersonaVLM, an innovative personalized multimodal agent framework designed for long-term personalization. It transforms a general-purpose MLLM into a personalized assistant by integrating three key capabilities: (a) Remembering: It proactively extracts and summarizes chronological multimodal memories from interactions, consolidating them into a personalized database. (b) Reasoning: It conducts multi-turn reasoning by retrieving and integrating relevant memories from the database. (c) Response Alignment: It infers the user's evolving personality throughout long-term interactions to ensure outputs remain aligned with their unique characteristics. For evaluation, we establish Persona-MME, a comprehensive benchmark comprising over 2,000 curated interaction cases, designed to assess long-term MLLM personalization across seven key aspects and 14 fine-grained tasks. Extensive experiments validate our method's effectiveness, improving the baseline by 22.4% (Persona-MME) and 9.8% (PERSONAMEM) under a 128k context, while outperforming GPT-4o by 5.2% and 2.0%, respectively. Project page: https://PersonaVLM.github.io.

4
2026 arXiv PEARL Personalized Understanding

PEARL: Personalized Streaming Video Understanding Model

PEARL 首次定义个性化流式视频理解,并用双粒度记忆与概念感知检索实现免训练个性化视频问答。

PEARL: Personalized Streaming Video Understanding Model
中文导读
问题背景
PEARL 处理的是个性化助手从静态图片走向连续视频流时暴露出的能力缺口:用户会在任意时刻注册人物、物体或动作概念,随后又围绕当前画面或过去片段提问。既有 personalized VLM 多数面向静态概念识别,个性化视频方法又常停留在离线短视频和单轮问答,在线流式视频模型则通常不理解用户动态定义的私有概念。因此 PSVU 的关键不是简单加长上下文,而是把概念注册、实时 grounding、历史证据检索和多轮记忆更新放进同一协议。
核心方法
PEARL 是一个 plug-and-play、training-free 的双粒度记忆与检索框架。Concept Memory 保存用户定义概念的名称、视觉证据和由 VLM 生成的文本描述,用来把私有符号绑定到可理解语义;Streaming Memory 将连续视频按场景切成片段,并用 Qwen3-VL-Embedding-2B 编码成可检索向量。回答时,系统先识别问题中涉及的个性化概念,用概念描述重写查询,再从历史视频片段中检索 top-K 相关证据并扩展相邻片段,最后把相关概念、历史上下文、当前片段和原问题交给底层 VLM。这个设计把“概念是什么”和“概念曾在哪里出现”分开维护,避免把全部长视频历史直接塞进上下文。
评估
论文提出 PEARL-Bench,包含 132 个视频和 2,173 条精确时间戳 QA,覆盖 frame-level 人物/物体概念和 video-level 动作概念。主结果显示,Qwen3-VL-8B+PEARL 在 frame-level Avg 达到 52.24、video-level Real-Time 达到 48.39,超过对应离线基线和多个在线视频模型;PEARL 也能稳定提升 LLaVA-OV-7B、Qwen2-VL-7B 和 Qwen3-VL-8B 三种后端。消融表明 Concept Memory 主要拉升 Real-Time,Streaming Memory 主要改善 Past-Time,Query Rewriting 进一步提升检索匹配;延迟分析显示额外开销存在,但主要瓶颈仍在底层 VLM 推理。
借鉴意义
PEARL 的价值在于把 MLLM personalization 从图像概念识别推进到实时、连续、可交互的视频助手场景,并给出一个无需训练即可迁移到多种 VLM 的系统基线。它提示后续个性化助手需要显式维护概念记忆和时序证据,而不是只依赖长上下文或一次性 RAG。局限也很清楚:概念描述质量依赖注册阶段 VLM,动作级数据仍偏合成,长期记忆维护、冲突纠正、遗忘和开放式回答还没有充分解决。
Abstract

Human cognition of new concepts is inherently a streaming process: we continuously recognize new objects or identities and update our memories over time. However, current multimodal personalization methods are largely limited to static images or offline videos. This disconnects continuous visual input from instant real-world feedback, limiting their ability to provide the real-time, interactive personalized responses essential for future AI assistants. To bridge this gap, we first propose and formally define the novel task of Personalized Streaming Video Understanding (PSVU). To facilitate research in this new direction, we introduce PEARL-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically to evaluate this challenging setting. It evaluates a model's ability to respond to personalized concepts at exact timestamps under two modes: (1) Frame-level, focusing on a specific person or object in discrete frames, and (2) a novel Video-level, focusing on personalized actions unfolding across continuous frames. PEARL-Bench comprises 132 unique videos and 2,173 fine-grained annotations with precise timestamps. Concept diversity and annotation quality are strictly ensured through a combined pipeline of automated generation and human verification. To tackle this challenging new setting, we further propose PEARL, a plug-and-play, training-free strategy that serves as a strong baseline. Extensive evaluations across 8 offline and online models demonstrate that PEARL achieves state-of-the-art performance. Notably, it brings consistent PSVU improvements when applied to 3 distinct architectures, proving to be a highly effective and robust strategy. We hope this work advances vision-language model (VLM) personalization and inspires further research into streaming personalized AI assistants. Code is available at https://github.com/Yuanhong-Zheng/PEARL.

5
2026 arXiv Ego Personalized Understanding

Ego: Embedding-Guided Personalization of Vision-Language Models

Ego 用 VLM 内部注意力抽取少量概念视觉 token,免训练实现个性化识别、问答和描述。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
Ego 处理的是个性化 VLM 中一个很实际的矛盾:用户希望模型记住自己的具体实体,并在新图像、视频、问答和描述里稳定调用这些私有概念;但许多既有方法要么为每个概念做 test-time fine-tuning,要么依赖 retrieval、segmentation、DINOv2 等外部模块,扩展性和部署链路都不够干净。作者的出发点是,强 LVLM 在 reference image 上已经能通过内部视觉-语言注意力定位主体属性,因此可以直接把这部分内部视觉证据抽成概念记忆,而不是再训练新参数或外挂感知 pipeline。
核心方法
Ego 是一个 training-free soft memory 方法。概念注册时,LVLM 先根据 reference image 生成描述主体的关键词,并估计主体面积;随后 Ego 读取关键词 token 到 reference visual tokens 的 cross-attention,在选定 LLM layers 上聚合重要性分数,只保留最代表个性化主体的 top visual tokens。保留数量由主体面积动态决定,并受每张参考图最多 50 个 token 的预算限制;多视角 reference 则逐图抽取后拼接。推理时,这些 selected visual tokens 连同概念名作为 soft prompt 注入上下文,让模型在 recognition、VQA、captioning 和 video QA 中回忆并使用对应个性化概念。
评估
实验覆盖 MyVLM、Yo'LLaVA、This-is-my-img、RAP validation split 以及用于 layer selection 的 COCO 子集,主要报告 recognition 的 Precision/Recall/F1、VQA accuracy、captioning recall 和 video QA。结果显示 Ego 在多项 recognition 设置中达到最强或接近最强 F1,概念引入时间远低于 RAP fine-tuning;在 captioning、multi-concept VQA、multi-concept captioning 和 video VQA 上优势更明显。消融表明 attention-guided token selection 优于 uniform token selection,动态 token budget 可减少背景干扰,自动 layer selection 也比手工或均匀层选择更稳。
借鉴意义
这篇工作的借鉴点在于把个性化概念表示从显式训练参数和外部视觉模块转向 LVLM 自身的内部视觉 token 记忆,为低开销、多概念和视频场景提供了更简洁的实现路径。它也提醒后续系统,reference image 不一定要完整塞进上下文,关键是选择真正承载私有实体身份的少量视觉证据。局限同样清楚:方法需要访问内部 attention 和 token states,依赖较强 backbone 的 visual in-context learning,大规模概念库、记忆更新、遗忘、权限和隐私管理仍需额外机制。
Abstract

AI assistants that support humans in daily life are becoming increasingly feasible, driven by the rapid advancements in multimodal language models. A key challenge lies in overcoming the generic nature of these models to deliver personalized experiences. Existing approaches to personalizing large vision language models often rely on additional training stages, which limit generality and scalability, or on engineered pipelines with external pre-trained modules, which hinder deployment efficiency. In this work, we propose an efficient personalization method that leverages the model's inherent ability to capture personalized concepts. Specifically, we extract visual tokens that predominantly represent the target concept by utilizing the model's internal attention mechanisms. These tokens serve as a memory of that specific concept, enabling the model to recall and describe it when it appears in test images. We conduct a comprehensive and unified evaluation of our approach and SOTA methods across various personalization settings including single-concept, multi-concept, and video personalization, demonstrating strong performance gains with minimal personalization overhead.

6
2026 arXiv ATMBench Personalized Understanding

According to Me: Long-Term Personalized Referential Memory QA

提出首个面向多模态、多来源、长期个性化指代记忆问答的基准 ATM-Bench,并用 SGM 结构化记忆表示系统性揭示现有 personal memory assistant 在困难子集上的明显短板。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
这篇工作关注长期个性化记忆问答里最缺的一块:用户问题往往带有私有指代、跨时间线、多来源证据冲突与视觉 grounding,但既有 benchmark 主要围绕对话历史,难以评估真实 personal memory assistant 在图像、视频、邮件混合场景下的能力。作者因此把目标从“长上下文能不能装下更多历史”转向“系统能不能稳定完成个性化指代解析、跨证据整合与 grounded answering”。
核心方法
核心贡献不是训练一个新模型,而是把任务拆成 benchmark 与 memory pipeline 两部分共同定义。ATM-Bench 提供约四年的多模态私人记忆、人工标注的答案与证据,并专门构造需要多证据聚合的 hard 子集;配套的 SGM 则把图像、视频、邮件统一转写成带时间、地点、来源、实体与 OCR 字段的 schema-guided memory item,方便后续检索、重排与回答。作者进一步把 assistant 流程标准化为 ingestion、retrieval、answer generation 三阶段,便于比较不同 memory system 设计。
评估
实验覆盖 5 个代表性 memory system 与一个标准 RAG 基线。结果表明,在平均需要 6.3 条证据的 ATM-Bench-Hard 上,现有系统准确率普遍低于 20%,说明瓶颈不只在检索,还在跨证据融合与个性化指代推理。对照实验同时显示,在信息量相同的前提下,SGM 普遍优于常见的自由文本 Descriptive Memory,证明结构化表示本身就能带来实质收益。
借鉴意义
对 MLLM personalization 而言,这篇论文的价值首先在于把“长期个性化记忆能力”从泛泛的长上下文叙事落成可测 benchmark;其次它说明 memory substrate 的组织形式会直接影响下游效果。后续若要做 state-aware assistant、episodic memory 或 multimodal RAG,这个基准和 SGM 式字段化表示都值得直接复用或扩展。
Abstract

Personalized AI assistants must recall and reason over long-term user memory, which naturally spans multiple modalities and sources such as images, videos, and emails. However, existing Long-term Memory benchmarks focus primarily on dialogue history, failing to capture realistic personalized references grounded in lived experience. We introduce ATM-Bench, the first benchmark for multimodal, multi-source personalized referential Memory QA. ATM-Bench contains approximately four years of privacy-preserving personal memory data and human-annotated question-answer pairs with ground-truth memory evidence, including queries that require resolving personal references, multi-evidence reasoning from multi-source and handling conflicting evidence. We propose Schema-Guided Memory (SGM) to structurally represent memory items originated from different sources. In experiments, we implement 5 state-of-the-art memory systems along with a standard RAG baseline and evaluate variants with different memory ingestion, retrieval, and answer generation techniques. We find poor performance (under 20% accuracy) on the ATM-Bench-Hard set, and that SGM improves performance over Descriptive Memory commonly adopted in prior works. Code available at: https://github.com/JingbiaoMei/ATM-Bench.

7
2026 arXiv M2A Personalized Understanding

M2A: Multimodal Memory Agent with Dual-Layer Hybrid Memory for Long-Term Personalized Interactions

M2A 用可编辑双层多模态记忆,让个性化知识随长期对话持续演化。

M2A: Multimodal Memory Agent with Dual-Layer Hybrid Memory for Long-Term Personalized Interactions
中文导读
问题背景
长期个性化助手需要在跨周或跨月、超出上下文窗口的交互中持续吸收用户新增或修正的视觉实体、别名、属性与偏好。既有概念 token/内部表示通常初始化后冻结,外部检索式 personalization 又多为只读;纯文本或单粒度记忆还容易遗漏视觉线索、压缩掉原始细节,难以处理冲突与时间变化。M2A 因而把个性化重新表述为可更新、可核查的长期用户状态维护问题。
核心方法
M2A 采用双智能体、双层记忆和三路检索。ChatAgent 按 Query-Generate-Update 循环判断何时查询或写入长期记忆,MemoryManager 将高层请求拆成迭代检索以及 add/delete/replace 操作。RawMessageStore 以不可变日志保留原始图文证据,SemanticMemoryStore 保存可编辑的高层观察,并用 evidence_ids 建立回溯链接;dense text、BM25 和 SigLIP visual retrieval 各取 top-10 后通过 RRF 融合,使系统能从语义摘要逐步收窄到细粒度、跨模态且时间一致的证据。
评估
作者在增强版 LoCoMo 上评测 10 条长期对话,平均 621 turns、约 10k tokens,并注入 214 张图像;问题覆盖 Single-Hop、Multi-Hop、Temporal、Open-Domain 与 Visual-Centric QA。M2A 在 GPT-4o-mini、Qwen3-VL-8B、GLM-4.6V-Flash 上的 Total Avg 分别为 44.64、54.69、56.48,均明显超过最佳 RAG/Mem0/A-MEM 基线。消融显示 iterative retrieval 贡献最大,双层证据结构次之,三路检索带来稳定增益;MemoryManager 使用约 5 turns 近期上下文即可获得大部分收益。
借鉴意义
M2A 的价值在于把 MLLM personalization 从一次性概念注册推进到训练无关的在线状态管理,并用“语义记忆负责效率、原始日志负责证据”的分层设计兼顾可编辑性与可追溯性。这套 Query-Generate-Update、渐进式检索和 evidence link 机制可直接借鉴到长期个人助手,但后续实现还需补足记忆正确率与冲突/遗忘评测、真实用户长期数据、工具调用成本,以及不可变原始日志与隐私删除要求之间的矛盾。
Abstract

This work addresses the challenge of personalized question answering in long-term human-machine interactions: when conversational history spans weeks or months and exceeds the context window, existing personalization mechanisms struggle to continuously absorb and leverage users' incremental concepts, aliases, and preferences. Current personalized multimodal models are predominantly static—concepts are fixed at initialization and cannot evolve during interactions. We propose M2A, an agentic dual-layer hybrid memory system that maintains personalized multimodal information through online updates. The system employs two collaborative agents: ChatAgent manages user interactions and autonomously decides when to query or update memory, while MemoryManager breaks down memory requests from ChatAgent into detailed operations on the dual-layer memory bank, which couples a RawMessageStore (immutable conversation log) with a SemanticMemoryStore (high-level observations), providing memories at different granularities. In addition, we develop a reusable data synthesis pipeline that injects concept-grounded sessions from Yo'LLaVA and MC-LLaVA into LoCoMo long conversations while preserving temporal coherence. Experiments show that M2A significantly outperforms baselines, demonstrating that transforming personalization from one-shot configuration to a co-evolving memory mechanism provides a viable path for high-quality individualized responses in long-term multimodal interactions. The code is available at https://github.com/Little-Fridge/M2A.

8
2026 arXiv CoViP Personalized Understanding

Contextualized Visual Personalization in Vision-Language Models

把 contextualized visual personalization 正式定义为“视觉识别 + 个性化记忆检索”的联合问题,并以 personalized image captioning、RL 后训练和 caption-augmented generation 作为统一解法。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
作者针对的是一种比“把名字替换对”更强的个性化理解能力:模型面对新图像时,不仅要认出图中人物、宠物或物体是谁,还要把用户历史视觉-文本上下文里与该概念相关的昵称、事件、偏好和经历一起调回来。现有个性化 VLM 方法大多停留在显式属性检索或短上下文设定,无法区分模型究竟是真的做了视觉 grounding,还是只是在利用文本捷径。
核心方法
CoViP 的关键设计是把 personalized image captioning 当成个性化视觉理解的中间任务。作者先构建含多概念 query image、个性化对话与正负交错上下文的 benchmark,再用 RL post-training 直接优化 caption 是否既认对视觉概念、又整合对了私人记忆;奖励被分成 recognition 与 retrieval 两部分。推理阶段的 Caption-Augmented Generation 则先让模型写出 personalized caption,再把这段 caption 作为显式中间记忆拼回上下文,辅助后续 LSD、LAR、ITR 等下游任务。
评估
在主 benchmark 上,现有开源与闭源 VLM 都暴露出明显短板,而 CoViP 在 Acc+ 等 personalized caption 指标上取得显著领先;加入 CAG 后,下游任务也同步提升,说明 caption 确实起到了可复用中间表示的作用。论文还通过 CapEval-QAs、人工评测和多组附录实验验证,CoViP 的主要增益来自更强的记忆检索与整合,而不是单纯把基础视觉识别做得更激进。
借鉴意义
这项工作的启发在于,很多 personalization 任务其实共享一个“视觉触发记忆恢复”的核心中间态,未必要为每个下游任务单独设计监督。对于后续 MLLM assistant,可以直接借鉴它的思路:先把 personalized latent state 外显成可验证的中间文本,再把这段中间记忆回灌给最终回答模块,以减少黑盒式端到端 personalization 的不可控性。
Abstract

Despite recent progress in vision-language models (VLMs), existing approaches often fail to generate personalized responses based on the user's specific experiences, as they lack the ability to associate visual inputs with a user's accumulated visual-textual context. We newly formalize this challenge as contextualized visual personalization, which requires the visual recognition and textual retrieval of personalized visual experiences by VLMs when interpreting new images. To address this issue, we propose CoViP, a unified framework that treats personalized image captioning as a core task for contextualized visual personalization and improves this capability through reinforcement-learning-based post-training and caption-augmented generation. We further introduce diagnostic evaluations that explicitly rule out textual shortcut solutions and verify whether VLMs truly leverage visual context. Extensive experiments demonstrate that existing open-source and proprietary VLMs exhibit substantial limitations, while CoViP not only improves personalized image captioning but also yields holistic gains across downstream personalization tasks. These results highlight CoViP as a crucial stage for enabling robust and generalizable contextualized visual personalization.

9
2026 CVPR 2026 OmniPersona Personalized Understanding

Unified Personalized Understanding, Generating and Editing

OmniPersona 通过理解/生成概念令牌解耦、显式知识回放和编辑联合训练,在同一个 Bagel 7B MoT 中统一实现个性化理解、生成与图像编辑。

Unified Personalized Understanding, Generating and Editing
中文导读
问题背景
统一多模态模型虽然已能同时理解和生成图像,但仍难用少量参考样本稳定记住用户专属人物、宠物或物体,并让同一份概念知识跨识别、属性问答、身份保持生成和局部编辑一致生效。已有软提示方法容易把理解与生成压进同一表示空间而产生任务干扰,外部检索又与统一流水线结合不够紧密;个性化编辑及跨任务一致性也缺少系统评估。
核心方法
OmniPersona 以 Bagel 7B MoT 为冻结骨干,为每个概念学习 32 个令牌,并将 16 个理解令牌和 16 个生成令牌分别路由到参数独立的专家分支,同时保留共享 attention 中的信息交互。显式知识回放把软令牌中的属性先转成可检查的查询与文本记忆,再重写生成提示;工程上将意图解析、记忆检索和提示组合压缩为一次调用。训练联合优化理解交叉熵、生成 Rectified Flow 和编辑损失,并用 concept removal 编辑监督强化概念定位、身份保持与指令对齐;OmniPBench 则统一覆盖理解、生成、属性推理生成和五类编辑。
评估
OmniPBench 基于 20 个概念、每概念约 10 张训练图像评测。OmniPersona 在统一开源模型中取得 Rec. 0.852、Gen CLIP-I 0.791、Face-Simi 0.413、PARG Score/CLIP-I 0.613/0.788,以及编辑 SEMA-C 0.711、QUAL-I 0.605、平均 0.658;PARG Score 比 UniCTokens 高 70.8%,编辑平均分也超过 GPT-4o+IP 的 0.558。消融表明解耦令牌、知识回放和编辑数据均有效,但 DINO、CLIP-T 及依赖长文本属性的 PARG 仍未全面领先,且评测规模只有 20 个概念。
借鉴意义
这项工作把个性化从单一概念识别或主体生成推进到同模型、同概念、同协议下的理解—生成—编辑协同,并提供了结构解耦和显式知识回放两个可诊断设计。对后续系统最值得借鉴的是:为冲突任务保留专属表示槽位,把隐式个性化属性外显后再跨分支复用,并将编辑作为概念定位与身份保持的联合监督。实际扩展时仍需解决每概念 2,000 步优化、多概念持续更新、复杂背景误编辑、身份保持与指令遵循权衡,以及闭源裁判带来的复现风险。
Abstract

Unified large multimodal models (LMMs) have achieved remarkable progress in general-purpose multimodal understanding and generation. However, they still operate under a "one-size-fits-all" paradigm and struggle to model user-specific concepts (e.g., generate a photo of `<maeve>`) in a consistent and controllable manner. Existing personalization methods typically rely on external retrieval, which is inefficient and poorly integrated into unified multimodal pipelines. Recent personalized unified models introduce learnable soft prompts to encode concept information, yet they either couple understanding and generation or depend on complex multi-stage training, leading to cross-task interference and ultimately to fuzzy or misaligned personalized knowledge. We present OmniPersona, an end-to-end personalization framework for unified LMMs that, for the first time, integrates personalized understanding, generation, and image editing within a single architecture. OmniPersona introduces structurally decoupled concept tokens, allocating dedicated subspaces for different tasks to minimize interference, and incorporates an explicit knowledge replay mechanism that propagates personalized attribute knowledge across tasks, enabling consistent personalized behavior. To systematically evaluate unified personalization, we propose OmniPBench, extending the public UnifyBench concept set with personalized editing tasks and cross-task evaluation protocols integrating understanding, generation, and editing. Experimental results demonstrate that OmniPersona delivers competitive and robust performance across diverse personalization tasks. We hope OmniPersona will serve as a strong baseline and spur further research on controllable, unified personalization.

10
2026 KDD 2026 TAME Personalized Understanding

TAMEing Long Contexts in Personalization: Towards Training-Free and State-Aware MLLM Personalized Assistant

提出首个 long-context MLLM personalization 基准 LCMP,并以双记忆与 RA2G 为核心,给出一种免训练、状态感知的 personalized assistant 框架。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
TAME 试图解决的是比“识别用户私有概念”更进一步的问题:在长期图文对话中,个性化概念会不断发生状态变化,模型需要区分哪些属性是长期稳定的,哪些只是近期短期状态,并在回答时优先使用与当前问题最匹配的那部分记忆。作者认为,现有个性化方法普遍把概念理解成静态实体,因此即便引入 RAG,也很难处理随时间变化的偏好、健康状态或近期事件。
核心方法
TAME 的核心是双记忆设计与 RA2G。系统先用 Dynamic State Memory 增量记录近期变化,再把被判定为长期稳定的属性迁移到 Static Personalized Memory;当动态记忆过长时,还会执行容量控制与过期清理。面对新问题时,框架先做实体 grounding,再在双记忆中检索与该 concept 最相关的上下文,随后通过 Align 步骤把多条记忆压缩成与当前 query 真正匹配的文本上下文,最后再交给底层 MLLM 回答。整个流程不依赖重新训练 backbone。
评估
作者同时提出 LCMP,用 30 个 personalized concepts、约 420 条历史对话和 easy/hard 两类问题系统评估 long-context personalization。实验显示,MyVLM、Yo'LLaVA 等训练式方法在 LCMP 上明显乏力,PeKit、R2P 这类 training-free/RAG 路线虽有提升但仍受单记忆限制;TAME 在 hard subset 上优势更突出,说明它的收益主要来自更合理的状态记忆组织与 query-aware alignment,而非单纯换了更强 backbone。
借鉴意义
在本页所有工作里,TAME 最接近“真正的 personalized assistant”形态。它把 personalization 从概念识别、属性替换推进到状态跟踪与长时记忆管理,并且给出了无需额外训练的系统路径。后续做多轮 assistant、episodic memory 或 user state modeling 时,双记忆分层和 retrieve-then-align 这两个设计都很值得直接沿用。
Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) Personalization is a critical research problem that facilitates personalized dialogues with MLLMs targeting specific entities (known as personalized concepts). However, existing methods and benchmarks focus on the simple, context-agnostic visual identification and textual replacement of the personalized concept (e.g., "A yellow puppy" -> "Your puppy Mochi"), overlooking the ability to support long-context conversations. An ideal personalized MLLM assistant is capable of engaging in long-context dialogues with humans and continually improving its experience quality by learning from past dialogue histories. To bridge this gap, we propose LCMP, the first Long-Context MLLM Personalization evaluation benchmark. LCMP assesses the capability of MLLMs in perceiving variations of personalized concepts and generating contextually appropriate personalized responses that reflect these variations. As a strong baseline for LCMP, we introduce a novel training-free and state-aware framework TAME. TAME endows MLLMs with double memories to manage the temporal and persistent variations of each personalized concept in a differentiated manner. In addition, TAME incorporates a new training-free Retrieve-then-Align Augmented Generation (RA2G) paradigm. RA2G introduces an alignment step to extract the contextually fitted information from the multi-memory retrieved knowledge to the current questions, enabling better interactions for complex real-world user queries. Experiments on LCMP demonstrate that TAME achieves the best performance, showcasing remarkable and evolving interaction experiences in long-context scenarios.

11
2026 TMLR 2026 PeKit Personalized Understanding

Personalization Toolkit: Training Free Personalization of Large Vision Language Models

PeKit 用检测、检索和视觉提示,把个性化对象识别变成免训练的推理时工具链。

Personalization Toolkit: Training Free Personalization of Large Vision Language Models
中文导读
问题背景
PeKit 针对训练式 personalized LVLM 难以真实部署的问题:MyVLM、Yo’LLaVA 等方法需要为每个对象训练识别头、embedding 或 soft token,面对频繁变化的个人对象库、多对象场景和视频输入时成本较高。论文认为个性化身份可以先由外部视觉工具定位和检索,再通过 visual prompting 显式交给任意 LVLM 使用。
核心方法
PeKit 是一个 tool-augmented inference-time pipeline。Reference 阶段,系统根据对象类别用 GroundedSAM/GroundingDINO 抽取 mask,用 DINOv2 对 mask 区域做对象级 pooling,并把多视图 embeddings、对象名和上下文写入 memory。Query 阶段,系统产生候选 proposal,和 memory 中对象 embeddings 做相似度匹配,超过阈值后用彩色 bounding box、名称和上下文构造 visual prompt;最后由 LLaVA、Qwen2-VL、GPT-4o、Gemini、Video-LLaVA 等任意 LVLM 生成个性化回答,全程不更新模型参数。
评估
实验覆盖 MyVLM、Yo’LLaVA、This-Is-My-Img single/multi-concept 和 This-Is-My-Video,比较多种 LVLM、分割/proposal 工具、DINOv2 与 CLIP、reference 数量、对象数量和阈值选择。定性与定量结果显示 PeKit 在图像和视频个性化上超过训练式方法,尤其在 negative 和 multi-concept 设置中更能拒绝错误概念。主要瓶颈来自 segmentation/proposal 质量、小对象 DINO patch 粒度、阈值校准和长 prompt。
借鉴意义
PeKit 的借鉴意义在于把 personalization 从“训练模型记住对象”改成“维护可替换的视觉工具链和对象 memory”。这种 backbone-agnostic、training-free 的设计更接近产品中的频繁增删对象、闭源 LVLM 接入和机器人/视频场景;同时它提醒后续系统必须把 mask 质量、检索阈值、对象上下文真实性和错误级联作为核心工程问题处理。
Abstract

Personalization of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) involves customizing models to recognize specific users or object instances and to generate contextually tailored responses. Existing approaches rely on time-consuming training for each item, making them impractical for real-world deployment, as reflected in current personalization benchmarks limited to object-centric single-concept evaluations. In this paper, we present a novel training-free approach to LVLM personalization called PeKit. We introduce a comprehensive, real-world benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate various aspects of the personalization task. PeKit leverages pre-trained vision foundation models to extract distinctive features, applies retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques to identify instances within visual inputs, and employs visual prompting strategies to guide model outputs. Our model-agnostic vision toolkit enables efficient and flexible multi-concept personalization across both images and videos, without any additional training. We achieve state-of-the-art results, surpassing existing training-based methods.

12
2026 CVPR Findings 2026 GDP Personalized Understanding

GDP: Graph-Based Dynamic Personalization for Multimodal Large Language Models

GDP 用带置信度权重的动态用户图,把 MLLM 个性化从静态身份识别推进到实时偏好更新。

GDP: Graph-Based Dynamic Personalization for Multimodal Large Language Models
中文导读
问题背景
GDP 针对的是个性化 MLLM 从静态用户画像走向真实交互时遇到的两类问题:视觉身份识别在遮挡、侧脸和复杂场景中不稳定,用户偏好又会随着新的图像和对话持续变化。论文因此把任务重点从“给定一个人能不能认出来”扩展到“系统能不能把身份、场景、活动、物体、情绪和偏好作为可更新状态持续维护”,这比单次概念注入或普通 RAG 更接近真实个人助手。
核心方法
方法核心是一个 training-free graph memory 与经过 SFT 的 PE Agent 组合。PE Agent 从当前图像、对话、人脸识别结果和历史检索节点中抽取带置信度的用户相关节点;Graph Update 将用户、偏好、地点、活动、物体等节点写入加权图,并用置信度、时间衰减、共现频率和语义距离更新边权;回答阶段先在用户图中检索相关节点,再用 graph rerank 综合语义相似度、节点置信度和结构权重,最后生成兼顾即时意图和长期偏好的回复。
评估
论文构建 Personal Data、PQA Dataset 和 SFT Dataset,评测视觉身份识别与偏好问答。主实验中 GDP 的 VR Weighted 达到 0.956、PQA Weighted 达到 0.834,明显高于 RAP + Prompt 的 0.809 和 0.624;在 RAP-format 视觉识别补充实验中 weighted accuracy 达到 0.970。消融显示去掉 PE Agent、图存储、SFT、图增强、置信度或 graph rerank 都会带来明显退化,说明动态结构化记忆不是普通文本检索可以直接替代的。
借鉴意义
这篇工作的价值在于把 MLLM personalization 明确推向“动态图记忆”范式:用户画像不再是一次性文本 profile,而是能随交互更新、带置信度和关系结构的多模态状态。它为后续长期个人助手提供了可复用的偏好抽取、状态更新和偏好感知检索框架,同时也暴露出隐私保护、错误记忆纠正、偏好冲突处理和长期漂移评估仍是必须解决的问题。
Abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong cross-modal capabilities, and recent work has begun incorporating user identity and preference modeling to enhance personalization. However, existing approaches struggle to reliably recognize users in complex visual conditions (e.g., occlusion, non-frontal views) and rely on static user profiles without dynamically updating preferences, limiting their adaptability to real-world evolving user states. To address these challenges, we propose Graph-based Dynamic Personalization (GDP), a framework that applies preference confidence as dynamic weights to model user preferences in real time. Specifically, the system employs a Personalization Enhancement (PE) Agent to extract preference cues, estimate preference confidence, and leverage graph associations to enhance identity recognition under challenging conditions. Second, the dynamic user preference representations are stored and updated through a weighted graph. Finally, the system retrieves relevant preference-aware content to generate responses aligned with both immediate intent and long-term preferences. In addition, we construct the GDP dataset, the first benchmark dedicated to dynamic multimodal personalization, along with a complete data construction pipeline. Experimental results show that GDP achieves state-of-the-art performance on personalized multimodal tasks such as identity recognition and personalized question answering.

13
2026 Findings of ACL 2026 LongMP-Bench Personalized Understanding

LongMP-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Persona Understanding in Long-Term Dialogues

LongMP-Bench 构建长期、多模态、动态 persona 对话基准,系统暴露当前 MLLM 在视觉身份一致性、persona 演化追踪和长程记忆利用上的短板。

LongMP-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Persona Understanding in Long-Term Dialogues
中文导读
问题背景
LongMP-Bench 面向真实个性化助手里的长期对话场景:用户画像不是一次性给定的静态文本,而会在多 session、多模态互动中逐步显露、更新甚至失效。既有数据集要么偏短期多模态对话,要么偏文本长期记忆,要么缺少同一用户、宠物或物品在时间线上的视觉一致性,因此很难诊断模型是否真正理解动态 persona。论文把视觉身份一致性、persona add/update/delete、干扰信息和长程证据选择放到同一基准中评测。
核心方法
论文贡献的是 benchmark、合成数据流水线和评测协议。数据构建先从 Yo'LLaVA、MyVLM、PODS、CelebA 等来源组织稳定的身份或个性化视觉素材,再生成包含人口属性、偏好、习惯、计划、经历、关系等维度的 persona,并把 add/update/delete 变化扩展成带日期 topic。随后系统结合短期记忆、长期记忆、图片 caption 和自然插入的 distraction 生成多 session 对话,再经规则过滤和人工修订保证图文对齐与视觉身份一致。评测上,LongMP-Bench 包含 persona understanding QA 与 personalized response generation,并额外设计 fact-level RAG baseline,把 timestamp、action、category、content、persona facts 和 image reference 组织成可检索记忆。
评估
LongMP-Bench 覆盖 150 个用户、2105 个 session、22998 个 turns 和 1366 张图片,QA 包含 Persona Detail Extraction、Abstention、Distraction Resistance、Persona Temporal Grounding、Time-Aware Persona Tracking 和 Personalized Concept Recognition。实验显示 GPT-4o、Qwen-VL-Max 等闭源模型整体较强,但在 persona temporal grounding、状态追踪和正例视觉身份识别上仍明显不足;Qwen-VL-Max + fact-level RAG 在多数 QA 与回复生成指标上最稳,说明细粒度、带时间的 persona memory 优于直接塞完整历史或粗粒度 session 检索。caption 输入能提升部分语义推理,却会削弱细粒度视觉身份判别。
借鉴意义
这篇论文的价值在于把 MLLM personalization 的评测重点从静态私有概念或单轮偏好扩展到长期、多模态、动态 persona state。它清楚暴露了当前模型在过期 persona、视觉身份一致性和图文证据融合上的失败模式,也说明后续系统需要结构化时间记忆、状态更新机制和更可靠的个性化视觉表示,而不能只依赖长上下文或通用 caption。局限在于数据主要为合成生成,真实用户长期行为、隐私约束、情绪与人格维度仍需进一步覆盖。
Abstract

Understanding multimodal user personas over long-term dialogues is essential for personalized and human-like dialogue systems. In realistic interactions, user personas evolve over time and are expressed through both language and visual cues. However, existing benchmarks provide limited support for evaluating such dynamic and multimodal persona understanding, due to shallow persona coverage, weak visual consistency, and static settings. We introduce LongMP-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating models’ ability to understand, track, and utilize evolving multimodal user personas in long-term dialogues. We propose a scalable, multi-step data construction pipeline to synthesize extended multimodal interactions, followed by human refinement. The resulting dataset contains long-term conversations from 150 distinct users, each maintaining visual identity consistency while exhibiting progressive persona evolution. Based on LongMP-Bench, we define evaluation tasks for persona tracking, multimodal reasoning, and personalized response generation. Extensive experiments show that current multimodal large language models struggle with long-term persona consistency, persona shifts, and effective multimodal integration. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/skspass/LongMP-Bench.

14
2025 arXiv Online-PVLM Personalized Understanding

Advancing Personalized VLMs with Online Concept Learning

提出 Online-PVLM,用超曲概念表征和 train-free 测试时概念注入实现可缓存、可扩展的在线 personalized VLM,并配套构建大规模 OP-Eval 基准。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
这篇论文抓住的是 personalized VLM 的系统瓶颈:传统方法往往每加入一个新概念就要单独学习或微调 embedding,在线场景下既不实时,也很难扩展到大量概念。作者因此把问题重写为“如何在不做 test-time training 的前提下,为新概念即时生成可检索、可复用、还能支持多概念推理的表示”。
核心方法
Online-PVLM 以 hyperbolic representation 为核心。训练阶段,模型学习把概念图像压到更适合层级与细粒度区分的超曲空间,同时把 concept memory bank 与 VLM 主干联训;推理阶段则支持 parsing mode 与 retrieval mode,两者共享 concept embedding cache。这样新概念可以通过少量参考图像在线生成 embedding 并直接写入 memory bank,无需再次微调参数。作者还专门构建 OP-Eval,从单概念、多概念、confusion QA 与 captioning 等维度系统评估在线概念学习。
评估
实验表明,Online-PVLM 在 novel concept identification 与 QA 上明显超过基线,并且在 cached concept 与 1000 概念级别的扩展测试里仍能稳定工作,验证了 concept caching 的工程价值。消融结果支持超曲表示、概念 memory bank 与双模式推理都在起作用。不过 captioning 指标并未全面压过生成式基线,说明它的优势更集中在判别式 grounding 与 scalable retrieval,而非更强的个性化文本生成。
借鉴意义
如果把个性化助手看成持续接收新私有概念的系统,这篇论文提供了一个更接近产品形态的在线注入范式。它的最大借鉴点不只是超曲几何本身,而是把 personalization 从“一次性为少数概念微调模型”改成“维护一个可增长的 concept memory bank”。后续若与更强的 memory 管理、状态更新或多轮对话模块结合,会更接近完整的 MLLM personalization 系统。
Abstract

Personalized Visual Language Models (VLMs) are gaining increasing attention for their formidable ability in user-specific concepts aligned interactions (e.g., identifying a user's bike). Existing methods typically require the learning of separate embeddings for each new concept, which fails to support real-time adaptation during testing. This limitation becomes particularly pronounced in large-scale scenarios, where efficient retrieval of concept embeddings is not achievable. To alleviate this gap, we propose Online-PVLM, a framework for online concept learning by leveraging hyperbolic representations. Our approach makes a train-free paradigm for concept embeddings generation at test time, making the use of personalized VLMs both scalable and efficient. In addition, we develop OP-Eval, a comprehensive and large-scale benchmark comprising 1,292 concepts and over 30K high-quality instances with diverse question types, designed to rigorously assess online concept learning in realistic scenarios. Extensive experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of our proposed framework. Our source code and dataset will be made available.

15
2025 NeurIPS 2025 MMPB Personalized Understanding

MMPB: It's Time for Multi-Modal Personalization

MMPB 是首个系统评测 VLM 多模态个性化能力的大规模 benchmark,揭示当前模型在偏好推理、视觉概念注入、安全拒答和长上下文记忆上的明显短板。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
MMPB 针对的是 VLM personalization 评测缺口:通用 VQA benchmark 不测试用户特定人物、宠物、物体、角色和偏好,已有 personalized VLM 工作又覆盖概念少、缺少偏好推理和多轮持久性。真实个人助手不仅要识别目标概念是否出现,还要知道何时不该激活概念、回答是否符合用户偏好,并在多轮对话或长上下文后仍能保持一致。
核心方法
MMPB 将个性化评估拆成 concept injection、multi-turn dialogue、personalized querying 三阶段。数据覆盖 111 个 concepts 和 10,017 个 image-query pairs,包含 humans、animals、objects、characters 四类,其中 human 类加入 preference-grounded queries。任务分为 Awareness、Appropriateness、Coherency,并比较 image-based injection 与 Simple/Moderate/Detailed/Extended 文本描述注入;查询设计使用 concept-only 和 image-only distractor,避免单靠文本或图像 shortcut 作答。
评估
论文评估 23 个开源与闭源 VLM,包括 InternVL、Ovis2、LLaVA、Qwen-VL、DeepSeek-VL2、Claude、Gemini 和 GPT-4o。结果显示当前 VLM 与人类基线差距明显,text injection 普遍优于 image injection,10-turn 对话显著降低性能;闭源模型在人类概念上出现大量安全拒答,长上下文中概念位于中间位置最容易遗忘。Soft prompt 和 LoRA 能提升 LLaVA-1.5-13B,说明 MMPB 对 personalization 方法敏感。
借鉴意义
MMPB 的价值在于把 MLLM/VLM personalization 从零散概念识别推进到系统 benchmark:它同时测视觉 grounding、偏好推理、上下文持久性、安全拒答和注入模态差异。对后续研究来说,它提供了明确的失败模式和可比较评测协议,也提示 personalized MLLM 需要 memory、retrieval、policy-aware safety 和更稳定的视觉概念表示,而不只是更长 prompt。
Abstract

Visual personalization is essential in user-facing AI systems such as smart homes and healthcare, where aligning model behavior with user-centric concepts is critical. However, recent large Vision-Language Models (VLMs), despite their broad applicability, remain underexplored in their ability to adapt to individual users. In this paper, we introduce MMPB, the first extensive benchmark for evaluating VLMs on personalization. MMPB comprises 10k image-query pairs and includes 111 personalizable concepts across four categories: humans, animals, objects, and characters, with the human category enriched with preference-grounded queries. We structure personalization into three main task types, each highlighting a different key property of VLMs. Using 23 widely used VLMs including both open- and closed-source models, we evaluate personalization performance via a three-stage protocol: concept injection, multi-turn dialogue, and personalized querying. Our findings indicate that most VLMs (including some closed-source models) struggle with personalization, particularly in maintaining consistency over dialogue, handling user preferences, and adapting to visual cues. Our analysis reveals that the challenges in VLM personalization (such as refusal behaviors and long-context forgetting) highlight substantial room for improvement. By identifying these limitations and offering a scalable benchmark, MMPB offers valuable insights and a solid foundation for future research toward truly personalized multi-modal AI.

16
2025 arXiv SLC Personalized Understanding

Small-Large Collaboration: Training-efficient Concept Personalization for Large VLM using a Meta Personalized Small VLM

SLC 用一个可复用的 meta personalized small VLM 生成个性化概念线索,再由冻结的大 VLM 反思校验并回答问题,以低训练成本把概念级个性化扩展到开源和闭源大模型。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
SLC 针对的是 personalized VLM 落地时的成本与能力错配:大 VLM 具备复杂多模态推理能力,但闭源 API 不可微调,开源大模型为每个用户概念反复训练也代价过高;小 VLM 更容易吸收私有概念,却难以承担复杂问答和多概念推理。作者因此把个性化链路拆开,让低成本小模型处理用户概念感知,让大模型负责视觉校验和最终回答。这个问题设定更接近真实助手部署,因为用户概念会持续新增,系统不能依赖每次重训大模型。
核心方法
方法核心是 small-large collaboration。离线阶段,作者从公共 personalization 数据中抽取概念图像的 CLIP embedding,用 K-means 聚成 10 个 meta-concepts,并为每个簇训练一个 LoRA adapter,得到可复用的 meta personalized small VLM。在线阶段,新用户概念只需用参考图像匹配最相近的 meta-concept adapter,无需再训练;小模型随后输出结构化 concept report,包括 present、绝对位置和相对位置。大模型先从概念描述中抽取稳定身份短语,再用两道 yes/no 视觉核验执行 test-time reflection,删除误检或错误位置,最后只基于清洗后的 detection report 生成答案。
评估
实验覆盖 Yo'LLaVA、MC-LLaVA 和专门诊断幻觉的 SQA,并比较 LLaVA-1.5-13B、Qwen2.5VL-32B/72B 与 GPT-4o 等大模型后端。主结果显示,SLC + GPT-4o 在 Yo'LLaVA 上达到 0.951 recognition 和 0.979 VQA,SLC + LLaVA-13B 也能以约 1.7e17 训练 FLOPs 接近或超过多种重微调基线。消融表明,小模型 cue 与大模型 reflection 缺一不可:去掉 reflection 会明显损害 No recall 和 SQA,去掉 detector 又会伤害 Yes recall。Top-1 meta adapter 选择也比融合多个 adapter 更稳。
借鉴意义
这篇工作的价值在于把大模型个性化从“直接训练大模型”改写成一个可审计的协作协议:小模型低成本吸收私有概念,大模型负责校验、推理和语言生成。它天然兼容闭源大 VLM,也为产品中的概念注册、概念检测、误检过滤和回答生成提供了清晰模块边界。局限是 personalization 仍主要停留在概念级识别与问答,长期记忆、用户状态演化、推理延迟和 API 成本还需要后续系统补齐。
Abstract

Personalizing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to transform them into daily assistants has emerged as a trending research direction. However, leading companies like OpenAI continue to increase model size and develop complex designs such as the chain of thought (CoT). While large VLMs are proficient in complex multi-modal understanding, their high training costs and limited access via paid APIs restrict direct personalization. Conversely, small VLMs are easily personalized and freely available, but they lack sufficient reasoning capabilities. Inspired by this, we propose a novel collaborative framework named Small-Large Collaboration (SLC) for large VLM personalization, where the small VLM is responsible for generating personalized information, while the large model integrates this personalized information to deliver accurate responses. To effectively incorporate personalized information, we develop a test-time reflection strategy, preventing the potential hallucination of the small VLM. Since SLC only needs to train a meta personalized small VLM for the large VLMs, the overall process is training-efficient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first training-efficient framework that supports both open-source and closed-source large VLMs, enabling broader real-world personalized applications. We conduct thorough experiments across various benchmarks and large VLMs to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SLC framework. The code will be released at https://github.com/Hhankyangg/SLC.

17
2025 NeurIPS 2025 RePIC Personalized Understanding

RePIC: Reinforced Post-Training for Personalizing Multi-Modal Language Models

RePIC 用 GRPO 和可验证奖励替代大规模 caption SFT,让 MLLM 在多概念个性化图像描述中更稳定地识别目标、调用名称并避免照抄错误 reference。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
RePIC 针对的是 personalized image captioning 中最容易被 SFT 掩盖的问题:模型不仅要从 reference demonstrations 中学到私人名称,还要判断 query image 里哪些对象真的与 reference 对应,并在多概念场景中同时保持视觉忠实和身份绑定。现有 post-training 方法即使用大量 caption 数据训练,在 2 到 4 个概念同时出现时仍容易漏识别、复制 reference 或生成不符合 query 图像的描述,因此作者把问题转向可验证的视觉一致性、定位和名称使用行为。
核心方法
方法核心是用 GRPO 做 RL post-training,并把 personalized captioning 拆成三类可验证奖励。OCT 用正负 image pair 训练 query-reference 是否同一对象的 yes/no 判断,VLT 用 RefCOCO 风格的 IoU 奖励强化定位能力,ICT 则检查输出 caption 是否正确包含单个或多个 reference 名称,其中 Multi-ICT 专门面向多概念覆盖。为了避免模型只输出短句骗过名称奖励,RePIC 还加入 detailed prompt 和 length regularization,使模型在调用私人名称的同时保留足够的视觉描述。
评估
实验显示 RePIC 的优势主要集中在多概念个性化 grounding。它只用约 2K RL 数据就在 single-concept 上接近 210K SFT baseline,并在 2-concept skip/retrieval F1 上达到 99.4/95.7;更关键的是,在 OOD 4-concept 设置中显著超过 RAP-Qwen 和 RAP-LLaVA。wrong visual demonstration 评估中 RePIC 更少盲目复制 reference 名称,消融也表明 ICT 是 identity grounding 的核心,VLT 和 OCT 提供必要的视觉支撑,而显式 reasoning template 反而不如直接生成 caption 稳定。
借鉴意义
这篇论文对 MLLM personalization 的借鉴点在于,它把个性化训练信号从昂贵完整 caption 监督改成一组可验证的局部行为奖励,尤其证明多概念 personalized understanding 需要专门的 Multi-ICT 训练,不能期待 single-concept 能自然外推。它也提醒后续系统必须同时评估正例、负例和 wrong demonstration,否则容易把名称召回率误判成真正的视觉 grounding。
Abstract

Recent multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) often struggle to generate personalized image captions, even when trained on high-quality captions. In this work, we observe that such limitations persist in existing post-training-based MLLM personalization methods. Specifically, despite being post-tuned with large-scale caption data through supervised fine-tuning (SFT), these models frequently fail to produce faithful descriptions in real-world scenarios, such as multi-concept image captioning. However, acquiring large-scale, high-quality captions for such complex settings is both costly and difficult. To address the data-centric nature of SFT, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training framework. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first RL-based approach to post-train MLLMs for personalized image captioning. Our method significantly enhances both visual recognition and personalized generation capabilities of MLLMs, and consistently outperforms existing SFT-based baselines, especially in the challenging multi-concept image captioning task. Project page: https://github.com/oyt9306/RePIC

18
2025 ICCV 2025 R2P Personalized Understanding

Training-Free Personalization via Retrieval and Reasoning on Fingerprints

R2P 用 VLM 生成概念指纹,并通过检索、属性推理和跨模态验证实现无需训练的个性化识别。

Training-Free Personalization via Retrieval and Reasoning on Fingerprints
中文导读
问题背景
R2P 处理的是 training-free personalized VLM 中的细粒度实例识别问题:用户概念往往是同一语义类别内的具体物体,传统 MyVLM、Yo’LLaVA 需要训练概念头或 soft token,RAP 虽用检索降低新增成本但仍依赖个性化指令训练。论文认为 VLM 已具备描述类别属性的内部知识,关键是把用户实例转成可区分的 fingerprint attributes,并在查询时用属性推理而不是只靠整体 embedding 相似度。
核心方法
R2P 构建个人数据库时,对每个概念用单张 reference image、概念名和类别提示 VLM 生成 description 与 distinctive fingerprint attributes,同时保存视觉和文本 embedding。查询阶段先用 CLIP image/text embedding 与 FAISS 检索 Top-K 候选,再让 VLM 做 attribute-focused CoT,比较 query 与候选指纹的共享属性。为抑制细粒度属性幻觉,R2P 用跨模态属性验证检查预测;若 CoT 与验证不一致,则触发更昂贵的 pairwise reasoning,让 VLM 直接比较 query image 与候选 reference image。
评估
实验覆盖 MyVLM、Yo’LLaVA 和新建 PerVA,任务包括 recognition、captioning 和 personalized VQA。R2P 在 MyVLM 上 weighted recognition 达到 97.4、captioning recall 91.4;在 Yo’LLaVA 上 weighted recognition 94.4、captioning recall 87.1,并在 personalized VQA 上达到 96.5;在强调视觉歧义的 PerVA 上 weighted recognition 91.8、captioning recall 72.5,超过 RAP。消融显示 fingerprint attributes 是主要增益来源,单纯 CoT 没有属性约束时甚至可能退化。
借鉴意义
R2P 的价值在于证明个性化不一定要训练模型,也可以把用户概念表示成可解释的属性指纹,再用检索、推理和验证组合完成实例级识别。它比纯 embedding 检索更可读,比 per-concept training 更适合动态个人概念库;同时也暴露出推理延迟、VLM 属性抽取质量、CLIP 属性对齐和多 reference 长期更新仍是后续系统需要处理的瓶颈。
Abstract

Vision Language Models (VLMs) have lead to major improvements in multimodal reasoning, yet they still struggle to understand user-specific concepts. Existing personalization methods address this limitation but heavily rely on training procedures, that can be either costly or unpleasant to individual users. We depart from existing work, and for the first time explore the training-free setting in the context of personalization. We propose a novel method, Retrieval and Reasoning for Personalization (R2P), leveraging internal knowledge of VLMs. First, we leverage VLMs to extract the concept fingerprint, i.e., key attributes uniquely defining the concept within its semantic class. When a query arrives, the most similar fingerprints are retrieved and scored via chain of thought reasoning. To reduce the risk of hallucinations, the scores are validated through cross-modal verification at the attribute level: in case of a discrepancy between the scores, R2P refines the concept association via pairwise multimodal matching, where the retrieved fingerprints and their images are directly compared with the query. We validate R2P on two publicly available benchmarks and a newly introduced dataset, Personal Concepts with Visual Ambiguity (PerVA), for concept identification highlighting challenges in visual ambiguity. R2P consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on various downstream tasks across all benchmarks. Code and data are available at the project page: Training-Free Personalization.

19
2025 ICCV 2025 PVChat Personalized Understanding

PVChat: Personalized Video Chat with One-Shot Learning

PVChat 用单个参考视频训练个性化 ViLLM,让模型能按人名理解视频中的特定个体。

PVChat: Personalized Video Chat with One-Shot Learning
中文导读
问题背景
PVChat 面向通用视频大模型缺少身份绑定能力的问题:模型能识别“有人在说话”或“有人在治疗”,却难以把事件稳定绑定到用户指定的 Wilson、Tom 或 Sarah。真实医疗、家庭和社交助手需要在 query video 中区分目标个体、相似干扰者和多人互动,因此论文把任务设定为每个主体只给一个 reference video 后,回答存在、外观、动作和位置等主体感知问题。
核心方法
方法由数据构造、模型结构和训练策略三部分组成。数据侧从单个参考视频抽取 HQ-face,通过 ConsisID、PhotoMaker、LivePortrait 合成身份保持正样本,并从 Laion-Face-5B、CelebV-HQ 等来源构造相似人脸 hard negatives,再生成四类个性化 QA。模型侧把 ViLLM 的注意力改为 ReLU Routing Mixture-of-Heads,让 shared heads 保留通用语义,routed heads 根据当前 token/视频证据承担主体特定信息。训练上先做 image understanding 预训练,再做 video QA fine-tuning,并用 SPR 控制路由稀疏度、HAE 防止 routed heads 过度沉默。
评估
实验覆盖 Friends、Good Doctor、Ne Zha、医生、病人和 Big Bang 等 25 个角色,包含 304 个原始视频、2,304 个扩展视频和 30,000+ QA。主结果中 PVChat 的存在性 Acc 达到 0.901,明显高于 InternVideo2 的 0.342 和 VideoLLaMA2 的 0.470,同时在 BLEU、BERTScore、Entity Specificity 和 Descriptive Completeness 上也更高。消融显示 ReMoH 比普通 MoH 更有效,SPR/HAE 对训练稳定性关键,hard negatives 与身份保持正样本能缓解把相似人物误判为目标主体的问题。
借鉴意义
PVChat 的价值在于把 MLLM personalization 从静态图像概念推进到短视频中的 one-shot 主体感知问答,并给出较完整的数据增强和训练协议。它提示个性化视频理解不仅需要记住目标外观,还需要负样本、多人模板和动作/位置监督来建立可靠身份 grounding。局限也明确:方法仍依赖人脸与合成数据,新增主体需要训练/合成成本,对长期记忆、连续流式视频、隐私授权和非人主体的处理还不充分。
Abstract

Video large language models (ViLLMs) excel in general video understanding, e.g., recognizing activities like talking and eating, but struggle with identity-aware comprehension, such as "Wilson is receiving chemotherapy" or "Tom is discussing with Sarah", limiting their applicability in smart healthcare and smart home environments. To address this limitation, we propose a one-shot learning framework PVChat, the first personalized ViLLM that enables subject-aware question answering (QA) from a single video for each subject. Our approach optimizes a Mixture-of-Heads (MoH) enhanced ViLLM on a synthetically augmented video-QA dataset, leveraging a progressive image-to-video learning strategy. Specifically, we introduce an automated augmentation pipeline that synthesizes identity-preserving positive samples and retrieves hard negatives from existing video corpora, generating a diverse training dataset with four QA types: existence, appearance, action, and location inquiries. To enhance subject-specific learning, we propose a ReLU Routing MoH attention mechanism, alongside two novel objectives: (1) Smooth Proximity Regularization for progressive learning through exponential distance scaling and (2) Head Activation Enhancement for balanced attention routing. Finally, we adopt a two-stage training strategy, transitioning from image pre-training to video fine-tuning, enabling a gradual learning process from static attributes to dynamic representations. We evaluate PVChat on diverse datasets covering medical scenarios, TV series, anime, and real-world footage, demonstrating its superiority in personalized feature understanding after learning from a single video, compared to state-of-the-art ViLLMs.

20
2025 ICLR PRPG Personalized Understanding

Personalized Representation from Personalized Generation

从少量真实图像出发,先训练 personalized generator 生成目标实例正样本与同类负样本,再通过对比学习把通用视觉 backbone 收缩成面向单个对象的 personalized representation。

Intro / Teaser Figure
中文导读
问题背景
PRPG 要解决的是数据极少条件下的个性化视觉表征学习,而不是直接做对话式 MLLM personalization。作者认为,很多 personalized vision 任务的难点在于实例级区分极细、真实样本又很少,仅靠通用表征难以把目标对象与同类近邻拉开;与此同时,个性化生成模型已经能从几张图合成该对象的更多视角与场景,于是问题变成能否把这些 synthetic samples 反过来用作 personalized representation 的训练信号。
核心方法
方法分三步走:先用少量真实图像训练 personalized generator;再生成目标对象的 synthetic positives 与同类但非目标对象的 synthetic negatives;最后对 DINOv2、CLIP 或 MAE 等 backbone 做 LoRA 式对比学习,让 embedding space 更偏向单实例辨别而不是泛化语义类别。论文还系统比较 DreamBooth、Cut-and-Paste、Masked DreamBooth 及其混合方案,强调个性化表示最需要的是 fidelity 与 diversity 的平衡。
评估
作者在 PODS、DeepFashion2 重构集和 DogFaceNet 重构集上评测 classification、retrieval、detection 与 segmentation。结果显示,personalized representation 在 36 个设定里提升了 32 个,说明这种表征不只对单一任务有效;同时,DB 更利于姿态泛化,CP 更利于保真,Combined 方案整体最好。实验也表明 synthetic pool 并非越大越好,真正关键的是让生成数据在实例细节与场景变化之间取得合适折中。
借鉴意义
虽然这篇论文不是直接面向对话式 personalized MLLM,但它提供了一个很重要的底层视角:高质量个性化理解未必要从语言侧开始,也可以先把视觉 backbone 的实例级表征做得更“私有化”。对于后续 personalized VLM 或 memory assistant,这类 personalized representation 可以作为更强的视觉编码器或概念检索前端,与 Online-PVLM、SLC 这类系统路线形成互补。
Abstract

Modern vision models excel at general purpose downstream tasks. It is unclear, however, how they may be used for personalized vision tasks, which are both fine-grained and data-scarce. Recent works have successfully applied synthetic data to general-purpose representation learning, while advances in T2I diffusion models have enabled the generation of personalized images from just a few real examples. Here, we explore a potential connection between these ideas, and formalize the challenge of using personalized synthetic data to learn personalized representations, which encode knowledge about an object of interest and may be flexibly applied to any downstream task relating to the target object. We introduce an evaluation suite for this challenge, including reformulations of two existing datasets and a novel dataset explicitly constructed for this purpose, and propose a contrastive learning approach that makes creative use of image generators. We show that our method improves personalized representation learning for diverse downstream tasks, from recognition to segmentation, and analyze characteristics of image generation approaches that are key to this gain.

21
2024 arXiv RAP Personalized Understanding

Remember, Retrieve and Generate: Understanding Infinite Visual Concepts as Your Personalized Assistant

RAP 用外部概念库和多模态检索,让 MLLM 无需重训即可理解用户新增视觉概念。

Remember, Retrieve and Generate: Understanding Infinite Visual Concepts as Your Personalized Assistant
中文导读
问题背景
RAP 针对用户视觉概念开放世界扩展的问题:宠物、玩具、角色、商品或内部代号会不断新增,若每次都训练 LoRA、概念 token 或分类头,成本和维护复杂度都会快速上升。论文把“记住新概念”从参数更新改写成外部数据库更新,让 MLLM 通过检索获得用户自定义名称和描述。
核心方法
RAP 分为 Remember、Retrieve、Generate 三步。Remember 阶段把每个概念的一张代表图、名称和描述写入用户数据库,并存储视觉检索特征;Retrieve 阶段先用开放世界 detector 产生输入图像的候选 ROI,再用图像编码器和概念库做相似度检索;Generate 阶段把检索出的概念图像、名称和描述拼入 LLaVA 或 Phi-3-Vision 输入,使模型在 caption、QA、recognition 和 grounding 中使用个性化概念。作者还构建统一指令数据,训练 backbone 学会利用检索上下文,但新增用户概念本身免训练。
评估
实验比较 LLaVA、Phi-3-Vision、LoRA、MyVLM、Yo’LLaVA 和 GPT-4V 等基线,任务覆盖 personalized captioning、QA、recognition 与 grounding。结果显示 RAP-MLLM 在 recall、precision、F1 和多概念扩展上更稳,只需每个概念一张图即可更新数据库;定性结果也显示它能输出 Anya、Bond 等用户名称。主要失败来自 detector 或 visual retriever 漏检、错检,一旦相关 ROI 未进入上下文,生成阶段很难恢复。
借鉴意义
RAP 的价值在于把个性化概念管理做成外部、可编辑、可解释的 memory,而不是把每个概念都固化进模型参数。它为个人助手中的实时概念增删改提供了清晰工程路线,也提示后续系统要把 personalization 分成概念库维护、视觉检索、上下文构造和回答生成几个可诊断模块。其短板是强依赖检索质量,且还缺少长期记忆冲突、版本和权限机制。
Abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in recognizing and understanding visual concepts. However, the open-world nature of visual concepts poses significant challenges for LMMs, as a model’s understanding is inherently limited to the concepts learned from its training data. Human users often wish to customize their models by introducing personal concepts through small samples. However, existing methods for learning new visual concepts typically require additional training, which is both time-consuming and labor-intensive. In this paper, we propose Retrieval-Augmented Personalization (RAP), a training-free method that enables models to understand infinite visual concepts by retrieving relevant concept information from a user-defined database. RAP consists of three stages: Remember, Retrieve, and Generate. The model first remembers user-provided concepts by storing images and descriptions in a database. Then, it retrieves relevant concepts based on the input image and query. Finally, it generates personalized responses using retrieved information. We further construct a personalized multimodal instruction dataset and instantiate RAP on LLaVA and Phi-3-Vision. Experiments on personalized captioning, question answering, recognition, and grounding show that RAP achieves strong performance with only one image per concept and supports flexible real-time updates.

22
2024 NeurIPS 2024 YoLLaVA Personalized Understanding

Yo'LLaVA: Your Personalized Language and Vision Assistant

Yo'LLaVA 用少量可学习软 token 把用户特定视觉概念注入 LLaVA,使模型能围绕个人对象进行识别、VQA 和无图文本对话。

Yo'LLaVA: Your Personalized Language and Vision Assistant
中文导读
问题背景
Yo'LLaVA 处理的是 personalized LMM 的早期核心问题:通用 LMM 能识别类别,却无法把 `<bo>`、`<A>` 这类用户私有标识符绑定到具体宠物、朋友、物品或角色。文本 prompt 很难覆盖细粒度外观,直接全量微调又不适合频繁新增概念;论文因此把个性化主体压缩成少量可学习 soft tokens,并要求模型同时支持图像识别、视觉问答和无图属性对话。
核心方法
方法冻结 LLaVA-1.5-13B,只为每个 subject 学习一个可读 identifier token、若干 latent soft tokens 和对应输出头权重。训练数据包含正例识别、随机负例、CLIP 检索 hard negatives,以及由 LLaVA 生成的无图外观问答;hard negatives 迫使模型区分相似但非同一主体的概念,无图对话则把颜色、材质、外观等稳定属性写入 soft prompt。默认使用 5 张训练图和 16 个 latent tokens,在较小参数增量下完成概念记忆与语言表达。
评估
评估覆盖 40 个 subjects、333 个 positive 与 13,320 个 negative recognition samples、571 个个性化 QA,以及 MyVLM 协议和通用 VLM benchmark。Yo'LLaVA 的 weighted recognition accuracy 达到 0.924,优于 LLaVA/GPT-4V 文本 prompt,并以约 16 个 learned tokens 接近 GPT-4V 5 张参考图的效果;text-only QA 达到 0.883。消融显示 hard negative mining 将 weighted accuracy 从 0.754 提升到 0.914,conversation data 对属性问答关键。
借鉴意义
这篇论文奠定了 personalized LMM 的 token-learning 路线:用极少可训练参数把用户私有概念接入通用 LMM,并系统展示识别、VQA、text-only QA 三类能力。它的局限也清楚:每个新概念仍需优化,多概念组合、长期更新、拒答和隐私删除机制不足;后续 RAP、PeKit、Ego、SLC 等工作很大程度上是在降低它的 per-concept training 成本或扩展其概念管理方式。
Abstract

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across a variety of tasks (e.g., image captioning, visual question answering). While broad, their knowledge remains generic (e.g., recognizing a dog), and they are unable to handle personalized subjects (e.g., recognizing a user's pet dog). Human reasoning, in contrast, typically operates within the context of specific subjects in our surroundings. For example, one might ask, "What should I buy for my dog's birthday?"; as opposed to a generic inquiry about "What should I buy for a dog's birthday?". Similarly, when looking at a friend's image, the interest lies in seeing their activities (e.g., "my friend is holding a cat"), rather than merely observing generic human actions (e.g., "a man is holding a cat"). In this paper, we introduce the novel task of personalizing LMMs, so that they can have conversations about a specific subject. We propose Yo'LLaVA, which learns to embed a personalized subject into a set of latent tokens given a handful of example images of the subject. Our qualitative and quantitative analyses reveal that Yo'LLaVA can learn the concept more efficiently using fewer tokens and more effectively encode the visual attributes compared to strong prompting baselines (e.g., LLaVA).

23
2024 ECCV 2024 MyVLM Personalized Understanding

MyVLM: Personalizing VLMs for User-Specific Queries

MyVLM 用外部概念识别头和可学习概念 embedding,让冻结 VLM 能识别并描述用户自己的具体人或物。

MyVLM teaser
中文导读
问题背景
MyVLM 面向 personalized VLM 的基础缺口:通用 VLM 可以描述“一个人在喝酒”或“狗在草地上”,却不知道这是用户本人、朋友、宠物或私人物品。直接替换通用 caption 容易误触发,LLM-guided 改写仍依赖外部识别结果,全量微调又不适合持续新增用户概念。论文因此把个性化拆成识别和表达两步。
核心方法
MyVLM 冻结 BLIP-2、LLaVA 或 MiniGPT-v2 主体,为每个概念增加外部 concept head 和一个 concept embedding。Concept head 判断输入图像是否包含目标概念,人物使用预训练人脸识别网络,物体使用视觉特征上的线性分类器;识别命中后,concept embedding 被插入 VLM 的中间特征序列,引导冻结语言模型在 caption、VQA 或 REC 输出中自然使用用户标识符。这个设计把“是否出现”和“如何说出”解耦,便于增量添加概念。
评估
实验覆盖 16 个人物概念和 29 个物体概念,任务包括 personalized captioning、VQA、REC、concept head recall/precision 与标准 captioning 能力保持。MyVLM over LLaVA 的 All recall 达到 95.97,明显高于 simple replacement 和 LLM-guided baseline;使用 4 张训练图时最稳,1 张图也能工作但效果下降。People recall 为 96.39%,object positive accuracy 为 96.58%,说明外部识别模块能提供强触发信号。
借鉴意义
MyVLM 的重要性在于把用户特定概念学习拆成可诊断的识别头和表达 embedding,成为后续 personalized VLM 的早期基准和数据来源。它证明冻结 VLM 也能通过小模块获得私有概念能力,但概念数量增长时维护多个 heads/embeddings 的成本不低,新增概念仍需训练,多概念组合、遮挡、相似外观和隐私机制也没有完全解决。
Abstract

Recent large-scale vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating textual descriptions for visual content. However, these models lack an understanding of user-specific concepts. In this work, we take a first step toward the personalization of VLMs, enabling them to learn and reason over user-provided concepts. For example, we explore whether these models can learn to recognize you in an image and communicate what you are doing, tailoring the model to reflect your personal experiences and relationships. To effectively recognize a variety of user-specific concepts, we augment the VLM with external concept heads that function as toggles for the model, enabling the VLM to identify the presence of specific target concepts in a given image. Having recognized the concept, we learn a new concept embedding in the intermediate feature space of the VLM. This embedding is tasked with guiding the language model to naturally integrate the target concept in its generated response. We apply our technique to BLIP-2 and LLaVA for personalized image captioning and further show its applicability for personalized visual question-answering. Our experiments demonstrate our ability to generalize to unseen images of learned concepts while preserving the model behavior on unrelated inputs.